I do have one book on my shelf like that: The Closing of the American Mind by Allan Bloom. The summary sounds so good. But I just can't get past the dry academic tone and the getting nowhere fast that I perceive in the book.
I do have one book on my shelf like that: The Closing of the American Mind by Allan Bloom. The summary sounds so good. But I just can't get past the dry academic tone and the getting nowhere fast that I perceive in the book.
Oh so many
A lot of Philosophical texts, Such as Leviathan by Thomas Hobbs, and assorted Nietzsche works.
As well as many texts on Folklore or religious texts like the Tibetan Book of the Dead, Bhagavad Gita and the Holy Vedas as well as actually reading the Bible.
Then just things like the Divine Comedy (which I have a beautifully leather bound copy) and the Argonautica etc
Oh so much reading to be done...........I should get off the internet and read!
I still haven't read Darwin's Origin of Species.
Before you shuffle off the 'net, Shuffle093: welcome to Chrons!
And a big recommendation for Dante. Don't know what translation you have. I read the entire Comedy in Mandelbaum's translation, and the first two of the three books also in the Sayers version. My impression is that Mandelbaum's translation was easier to read but that the notes in Sayers' version (Penguin Classics) were excellent. I would imagine Esolen's recent translation is a good choice. A leatherbound edition might be a lovely book, but perhaps an older translation that some of us would find harder to read than a recent one.
And I've got a book about the origins of music and language that I keep meaning to pick up.
If that's "The Singing Neanderthals" by Stephen Minchin, I highly recommend it. Fairly easy read for an academic book and super interesting.
I still haven't read Darwin's Origin of Species.
I still haven't read Darwin's Origin of Species.
I've got 3 or so copies of it and a digital and I've still not read much of it!
One problem is that the general understanding is so heavily presented in modern science that reading the old reference is actually reading older information; its already dated and the general theory itself lacks the same power that it once had when it was originally penned and published.