January 2020 Reading Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
I finished James H. Schmidt's The Witches of Karres. It is a funny one (as, in, slightly odd) to review, and its certainly not top draw. It has a reputation as being one of the classics of space opera, but it is in fact deeply flawed. The opening 100 pages features three witches, none of which are well introduced, and which take part in sudden, episodic, disjointed 'adventures' in a manner that reminded me of van Vogt, but without the sense of wonder or characterful writing. Deus ex machina's abound. I understand this made up a 1949 novella of the same name, which Schmidt expanded in 1966 to novel length. This first novella section is terrible, unfortunately. Then it segues into the second section, the extended 250 pages that made it novel length. It not even immediately obvious where the cutoff is to be honest, as there is a not a clear and satisfactory conclusion for the novella section. Perhaps to expand it into a novel, Schmidt ditched the originally novella ending. Anyway, the second section features most only one witch, and follows a single plot, and reads as though it were written by a completely different (and much more capable) author. Unfortunately, its not very good either, really, as SF. The ideas are derivative and the scientific explanation of the strange powers at work are entirely hand-wavy that it's basically fantasy in space. If you like it when your heroes ditch their spaceship on some random planet in the middle of nowhere and start wandering round the place without a spacesuit or consideration of changes in gravity, etc, then this may be the book for you. I didn't really care for it much, although it had it's moments of tension, I guess. If it had been written more concisely thirty years earlier, it might have got away with it, but basically it's a pot-boiler. It seems odd that I made it all 350 pages through it - its probably the longest bad book I've finished! :)
 
I finished James H. Schmidt's The Witches of Karres. It is a funny one (as, in, slightly odd) to review, and its certainly not top draw. It has a reputation as being one of the classics of space opera, but it is in fact deeply flawed. The opening 100 pages features three witches, none of which are well introduced, and which take part in sudden, episodic, disjointed 'adventures' in a manner that reminded me of van Vogt, but without the sense of wonder or characterful writing. Deus ex machina's abound. I understand this made up a 1949 novella of the same name, which Schmidt expanded in 1966 to novel length. This first novella section is terrible, unfortunately. Then it segues into the second section, the extended 250 pages that made it novel length. It not even immediately obvious where the cutoff is to be honest, as there is a not a clear and satisfactory conclusion for the novella section. Perhaps to expand it into a novel, Schmidt ditched the originally novella ending. Anyway, the second section features most only one witch, and follows a single plot, and reads as though it were written by a completely different (and much more capable) author. Unfortunately, its not very good either, really, as SF. The ideas are derivative and the scientific explanation of the strange powers at work are entirely hand-wavy that it's basically fantasy in space. If you like it when your heroes ditch their spaceship on some random planet in the middle of nowhere and start wandering round the place without a spacesuit or consideration of changes in gravity, etc, then this may be the book for you. I didn't really care for it much, although it had it's moments of tension, I guess. If it had been written more concisely thirty years earlier, it might have got away with it, but basically it's a pot-boiler. It seems odd that I made it all 350 pages through it - its probably the longest bad book I've finished! :)
Read this a long time ago and don't remember too much about it except that I really liked it.
 
Read this a long time ago and don't remember too much about it except that I really liked it.
It’s quite possible to enjoy it if one’s in the mood for it I would say, even though it’s kinda rubbish :) Although I’ve slated it, I did quite enjoy the book in parts.
 
I finished James H. Schmidt's The Witches of Karres. It is a funny one (as, in, slightly odd) to review, and its certainly not top draw. It has a reputation as being one of the classics of space opera, but it is in fact deeply flawed. The opening 100 pages features three witches, none of which are well introduced, and which take part in sudden, episodic, disjointed 'adventures' in a manner that reminded me of van Vogt, but without the sense of wonder or characterful writing. Deus ex machina's abound. I understand this made up a 1949 novella of the same name, which Schmidt expanded in 1966 to novel length. This first novella section is terrible, unfortunately. Then it segues into the second section, the extended 250 pages that made it novel length. It not even immediately obvious where the cutoff is to be honest, as there is a not a clear and satisfactory conclusion for the novella section. Perhaps to expand it into a novel, Schmidt ditched the originally novella ending. Anyway, the second section features most only one witch, and follows a single plot, and reads as though it were written by a completely different (and much more capable) author. Unfortunately, its not very good either, really, as SF. The ideas are derivative and the scientific explanation of the strange powers at work are entirely hand-wavy that it's basically fantasy in space. If you like it when your heroes ditch their spaceship on some random planet in the middle of nowhere and start wandering round the place without a spacesuit or consideration of changes in gravity, etc, then this may be the book for you. I didn't really care for it much, although it had it's moments of tension, I guess. If it had been written more concisely thirty years earlier, it might have got away with it, but basically it's a pot-boiler. It seems odd that I made it all 350 pages through it - its probably the longest bad book I've finished! :)
Now I really liked the original novella. It was just so crazily different (and for obvious reasons, probably unpublishable today). Some years later I found that it had been expanded and purchased the book toute suite but was disappointed - it just seemed a poorly written/planned attempt to cash in on the earlier success.
 
I finished James H. Schmidt's The Witches of Karres. It is a funny one (as, in, slightly odd) to review, and its certainly not top draw. It has a reputation as being one of the classics of space opera, but it is in fact deeply flawed. The opening 100 pages features three witches, none of which are well introduced, and which take part in sudden, episodic, disjointed 'adventures' in a manner that reminded me of van Vogt, but without the sense of wonder or characterful writing. Deus ex machina's abound. I understand this made up a 1949 novella of the same name, which Schmidt expanded in 1966 to novel length. This first novella section is terrible, unfortunately. Then it segues into the second section, the extended 250 pages that made it novel length. It not even immediately obvious where the cutoff is to be honest, as there is a not a clear and satisfactory conclusion for the novella section. Perhaps to expand it into a novel, Schmidt ditched the originally novella ending. Anyway, the second section features most only one witch, and follows a single plot, and reads as though it were written by a completely different (and much more capable) author. Unfortunately, its not very good either, really, as SF. The ideas are derivative and the scientific explanation of the strange powers at work are entirely hand-wavy that it's basically fantasy in space. If you like it when your heroes ditch their spaceship on some random planet in the middle of nowhere and start wandering round the place without a spacesuit or consideration of changes in gravity, etc, then this may be the book for you. I didn't really care for it much, although it had it's moments of tension, I guess. If it had been written more concisely thirty years earlier, it might have got away with it, but basically it's a pot-boiler. It seems odd that I made it all 350 pages through it - its probably the longest bad book I've finished! :)
I think this sums up for me the problems I have with so much (though by no means all) of the reputedly classics of that era. Whilst I loved these sort of books when I was reading them at the time, I now find the whole breathable air, normal(ish) gravity on all the planets, misogyny and other similar stuff painfully naïve and I just struggle to read, never mind enjoy them now. I do still occasionally dive in to read an old classic, and, whilst occasionally I'm blown away, more often it's somewhere between meh and unfinishable. I do have one coming up in my TBR pile sometime soon which I do have high hopes for; Roadside Picnic, so fingers crossed.
 
Now I really liked the original novella. It was just so crazily different (and for obvious reasons, probably unpublishable today). Some years later I found that it had been expanded and purchased the book toute suite but was disappointed - it just seemed a poorly written/planned attempt to cash in on the earlier success.
I read the original story then the novel and thought they were both great. My kind of pure SF, none of this Western in outer space stuff.
 
Well the last few posts on The Witches of Karres makes me want to wax axiomatic. As in

(1) Horses for courses
(2) Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
(3) Testimonials are the least dependable form of evaluation but the most effective advertising.
 
Reread Doyle's The Poison Belt yesterday; now rereading Lloyd Alexander's The High King, the 5th Prydain novel. Really good.
 
Still on Holdstock's The Hollowing, but also now diverted onto Cold Comfort Farm by Stella Gibbons, as mentioned up-thread. I found a nice Folio Soc copy second hand yesterday.
 
... now diverted onto Cold Comfort Farm by Stella Gibbons, as mentioned up-thread...
I enjoyed it, but not as much as I was supposed to, according to most reviews. Its nicely done, but funniest book ever written (as claimed on the cover of my copy)? Whoever wrote that hasn't read much humour... it's dryly amusing in places I guess.
 
funniest book ever written (as claimed on the cover of my copy)? Whoever wrote that hasn't read much humour...

I wish publishers would dispense with that kind of nonsense. I've not long since given up on Masters of Atlantis by Charles Portis, which Conan O'Brien (no less) called "One of the few laugh-out-loud novels I've read". I think I faintly smiled twice.
 
I finished Lirael at around 2am (couldn't put it down with 10% left) and started The Strange Bird - Jeff VanderMeer to calm down :)

I'm just downloading a number of books by Marc Laidlaw which are currently free on Amazon (not an author I'm aware of but . . . free ;) )
Thanks for the tip, I remember Laidlaw from INTERZONE back in the day (30+ years ago), also he had a story in Mirrorshades
 
I'm just downloading a number of books by Marc Laidlaw which are currently free on Amazon (not an author I'm aware of but . . . free ;) )
Marc Laidlaw, if I'm not mistaken, used to appear in Analog quite a bit and was quite good.
 
[...] I just started The Tiger in the Smoke by Margery Allingham.

Randy M.

Best laid plans. Shortly after starting this a coworker loaned me the six volumes of the graphic novel, Locke & Key by Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez.

Honestly, this is even more like early Stephen King than Hill other works I've read, a stream-lined, pared-down dark fantasy with more than a few horrific moments, but all grounded by the legitimate pain, courage, love and decency of the Locke family and friends. Keyhouse sits atop a portal to Hell. Only children find the keys to the various doors of Keyhouse, and all the odd things those doors lead to. Unfortunately, the portal to Hell is always a temptation and the current group of Locke children, Tyler, Kinsey and Bode, are severely tested. I still have half or a bit more of the final volume to finish, but it'll have to tail off badly not to get high marks from me.

And then back to Allingham.

Randy M
 
Shortly after starting this a coworker loaned me the six volumes of the graphic novel, Locke & Key by Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez.

This series has caught my eye in the local comic shop recently. I'll give it a serious look.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top