Teresa wrote, "I started reading Dickens by reading Oliver Twist and A Christmas Carol when I was eight or nine—an age where, like most children, I had no expectation I would understand every word in everything I read.... I am sure it is much more challenging trying to tackle such books for the first time at a later age, when not understanding a word or a reference is naturally more frustrating simply because our expectations are different."
I'm glad you said this. I'm sure you're right. When our children were growing up, they were used to hearing me read to their mom while she knitted, etc. Sometimes I read mystery novels or ghost stories, but often the selections were classic novels. It was natural for them to feel they could start reading such books whenever they wanted to, and one of the kids especially did so, though a few years older than you were, more like 12 or so. But then she tackled some very long books, such as Collins's The Woman in White, and Jane Eyre and even War and Peace -- yes, and she stuck with them. The fact is that these books and lots of other 19th-century novels are very readable indeed, provided one doesn't worry about too many details, keeps the book going with daily or at least frequent reading sessions, is not struggling against a habit of checking electronic devices every few minutes, and so on. When I was a college English teacher, I gave reading assignments of around 150-200 pages a week. Many of my students were not used to reading classics. They might be most comfortable reading, say, the Harry Potter books. But if their classroom achievement is any indication, many of them found they could get along quite well with just a Penguin Classics edition. I always emphasized that they should try to read sizeable chunks -- really get settled in with the book. This was advice that I'd received myself as a student, and it was good.