ColGray
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2023
- Messages
- 460
You cannot underestimate the level of inebriation great leaders like Churchill and Roosevelt regularly used. I remember reading a biography of Teddy Roosevelt that, at length, discussed the importance of being able to drink insane amounts of beer and liquor as table stakes for entering politics. Mores and expectations change over time, but, if the cultural expectations are one thing, then people act and enforce that expectation.It occurs to me that in the past and perhaps in the present lots of merchants would do business over a drink for two reasons. Inhibitions go down so people may speak the truth more resdily but also because people make rash descisions. If you were a merchant used to alcohol and you wanted to off load some cheap worthless item, what better way than to get your client drunk enough to think it a good idea. Reminds me of a friend who makes stupid internet purchases when drunk.
Also, although i don't drink much anymore, I seem to recall that ALL drunken conversations were serious, just not very coherant.
As of a decade ago, this was still the case if doing business in the Baltics: if you open a bottle of vodka, you finish a bottle of vodka. It's not just a "thing", it's culturally rude and insulting not to finish it. (Though, fun experiment: introduce someone who primarily drinks vodka to bourbon or whiskey and watch them the next morning. It. Is FUN!)