What'd I do?Parson said::WOW:
I was reacting to this.What'd I do?
But I was heavily influenced by the art and music of 2001 that I listened to since I was three, Star Wars at five and BSG a few years later. I was a SF fan before I could read.
When I was three we got the 2001 soundtrack. It was the deluxe type, with several pages of movie images and that truly evocative soundtrack. The images and sounds were mesmerizing. Everything so crisp and designed. By contrast, the real world was ugly and dirty looking (this was 1974, after all). To this day I don't think I've seen a "prettier" space suit. Not surprisingly, the SF films that stick with me the most are full of great design - SW, Tron, BR, Alien. They look like the future.I was reacting to this.
Being "heavily influenced by the art and music of 2001 when you were three? --- Wow!
"I was a SF fan before I could read." --- Double wow.
But your reaction reminded me I was an old man. I was in my middle teens before I saw any SF on the television (we only had one TV and at best three channels) and I never went to the movies before I was nearly 17 years old. So maybe what you point out wouldn't have seemed so strange to me if I had been more more recently.
Aside from the bone/satellite symbolism, I missed anything necessarily greater. I am a huge fan of Kubrick and it always seems like he's saying what is on the screen. What were you thinking?@Swank .... funny, I hardly remember any of the music of 2001, just that symphonic number played while showing the obelisk. Outside of Hal, my clearest memory of the movie was thinking it was super weird, so much so I didn't understand it all. A year or two later I began to think it was someone's drugged up dream. It's only been in the last third of my life that I've begun to understand some of symbolism at play.
Aside from the bone/satellite symbolism, I missed anything necessarily greater. I am a huge fan of Kubrick and it always seems like he's saying what is on the screen. What were you thinking?
I didn't understand the relevance and the correlation of the three different settings. It just seemed disjointed and unrelated. I'd have likely done better if I'd read the book before the watching the movie.Aside from the bone/satellite symbolism, I missed anything necessarily greater. I am a huge fan of Kubrick and it always seems like he's saying what is on the screen. What were you thinking?
1. Alien object shows up, alters humanity's course by making us tool users.I didn't understand the relevance and the correlation of the three different settings. It just seemed disjointed and unrelated. I'd have likely done better if I'd read the book before the watching the movie.
Wake me up when the Star Child finds a monolith. ; )1. Alien object shows up, alters humanity's course by making us tool users.
2. Humans make it to the moon, where the aliens left another object that will send an obvious signal to Jupiter when we are capable of extensive spaceflight.
3. Humans follow the signal to Jupiter, where the surviving human is altered into something new, changing the course of humanity again.
I've only watched it once from beginning to end and did not pick up on that. Should have. (I recall whispering to the friend I saw it with that our radar mustn't be very good not to have noticed sooner that a giant baby was orbiting the planet.)1. Alien object shows up, alters humanity's course by making us tool users.
2. Humans make it to the moon, where the aliens left another object that will send an obvious signal to Jupiter when we are capable of extensive spaceflight.
3. Humans follow the signal to Jupiter, where the surviving human is altered into something new, changing the course of humanity again.
I also did not pick up on that on my one and only viewing. I remember thinking at the time that it was three short stories which seemed related but the causality of the object and the human reaction escaped me entirely. I was of the opinion at the time that it was a kind of alien "watcher" who was charting human progress. I'd bet that if I'd had your summary I would have enjoyed the movie much more.1. Alien object shows up, alters humanity's course by making us tool users.
2. Humans make it to the moon, where the aliens left another object that will send an obvious signal to Jupiter when we are capable of extensive spaceflight.
3. Humans follow the signal to Jupiter, where the surviving human is altered into something new, changing the course of humanity again.
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
T | Problems switching to a gateway | Technology | 9 | |
Our Gateways into Fantasy | Book Discussion | 37 | ||
Gateway (again) | Book Discussion | 1 | ||
Boeing suggests Deep Space Gateway for Mars missions | Science & Nature | 45 | ||
Pohl's Gateway series coming to SyFy | General TV Discussion | 6 |