The Curious Orange
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2007
- Messages
- 148
I was as confused as hell on first reading. I went back and re-read GOTM after finishing MOI, and found it a lot clearer to follow second time round. It remains a highly confusing structure for a story, not helped by the fact that a major sequence near the begining is told in flashback without anything signalling to the reader that it is a flashback.
Deadhouse Gates remains the strongest book for me, purely because of the strength and scope of the story.
The characterisation and dialogue is somewhat sketchy in the earlier novels, but gets better with each book, as does the writing style. However, Erikson is not the strongest wordsmith, and still writes some clunky, awkward prose (IMO)
SE's worldbuilding is second to none, but worldbuilding to me is set dressing. Add me to the "I prefer GRRM" camp.
Deadhouse Gates remains the strongest book for me, purely because of the strength and scope of the story.
The characterisation and dialogue is somewhat sketchy in the earlier novels, but gets better with each book, as does the writing style. However, Erikson is not the strongest wordsmith, and still writes some clunky, awkward prose (IMO)
SE's worldbuilding is second to none, but worldbuilding to me is set dressing. Add me to the "I prefer GRRM" camp.