Anything written by Margaret Weiss and/or Tracey Hickman. Ye Gods what a travesty!
It was written in 1868/9, and I wouldn’t think it particularly fair to judge its title on our present day views of what’s sexist or not. How about ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’? The title could be construed as sexist and elitist, but that’s not anywhere near what the book’s really about.Little Women - no idea - can't get past the sexist title to want to read it!
Are those the Frank Herbert sequels, or the Brian Herbert/Kevin J Anderson sequels or the whole lot, Brian? I don't mind the former (though I didn't like where they went, particularly,) but I totally agree with ol' Barebones about the rest:Oh, lordy - Frank Herbert. Dune I consider a classic, but all of the sequels I found to be confused and a terrible waste of time.
Boneman said:The writing is appalling, and the storylines are predictable and fascile. Written for money, no other reason...
Sorry, I'm orthodox Herbertian. Dune is my favourite book and has been for a very long time. I've also enjoyed many of his non-Dune books. So I guess we'll have to disagree.Anything written by Frank Herbert should be given a miss, I've read Dune and I wasn't really impressed by it. Anything that that I read over thirty years ago I would give a miss as well.
Are those the Frank Herbert sequels, or the Brian Herbert/Kevin J Anderson sequels or the whole lot, Brian? I don't mind the former (though I didn't like where they went, particularly,) but I totally agree with ol' Barebones about the rest:
Money.I believe the gruesome twosome got the notes and the nod to finish that. Then do loads of prequels (WHY!!!!! PREQUELS RARELY EVER WORK! )