Batman Begins (2005)

Re: Batman Begins!

I agree, I was a bit put off by a member of family's comments, so I didn't get to the cinema to see it, I wish I had now, excellent showcase of actors, especially Gary Oldman, who I think, can do no wrong :)
 
Re: Batman Begins!

I got to see this at the weekend and was pleasantly surprised at how good it was :D
 
Re: Batman Begins!

Ther definitely is going to be a sequel. Most likely it will also be helmed by Chris Nolan. They may follow up on the Joker intro that comes at the end of the first movie.
 
Re: Batman Begins!

I just saw this for the first time and agree pretty much with all the comments here.

After the first half-hour I was thinking 'Do we really need all this background?', we already know about his parent's death, his fear of bats, but it grew on me.

It was an excellent cast, though I think Gary Oldman was wasted, and I find it hard to picture Liam Neeson as a Jedi or Rob Roy, so I had trouble here too. Michael Caine, on the other hand, was surprisingly good as Alfred.

Did I like the explanation for Batman's toys? Well yes obviously, but that wasn't the best part of the film.

I liked the way it was much darker. These comic book film adaptations are certainly getting better in recent years.

If I changed anything, I'd remove the love interest.
 
Re: Batman Begins!

I always thought the other movies should have shown Batman from the criminal's perspective. It's what you don't see that is scary. I love how this movie did that. I was also glad they cut all ties to any previous films.
 
Re: Batman Begins!

Nope, the second Batman (Batman Returns) film was one of the darkest in the series.
 
Re: Batman Begins!

Batman Returns was the darkest of the Bat films to date. So dark in fact, the studio wanted something more kid friendly for the next one, which is why Keaton bowed out. He didnt like the lighter approach in the script.
 
Review Batman Begins

As this is the week the 'revisionist' James Bond film, Casino Royale is released, it is fitting I picked up off the shelf of my local book shop, Batman Begins: Definitely Revisionist!

I was looking for something light (I have a couple of broken ribs, a gap left by a smashed tooth and creeping tetchiness!) and there was a row of Batman films on DVD on offer. One of those would while away some of time I am in the painkiller-induced haze my life seems to be at the moment.

But which one?

Originally I was attracted by the cast - nearly all British, is the first thing I noticed. And anything with Michael Caine and Gary Oldman is worth a nod. And Morgan Freeman, even though he’s American, ain’t bad.

I haven’t seen many of the earlier Batmen films – the joke-filled, too self-conscious lightness of the one or two I had watched made them less appealing to me than they might ordinarily be – and there were childhood memories of a black and white T.V. series. Did I really have a cape and try flying around the avenue?

There was a period of my life when I got hold of some pretty good ‘comic book’ Batmen – the sort of illustrated book that was trying to break from the sickly, ‘holier than thou’ supper hero for children. I particularly remember one ‘very dark’ story but couldn’t name it for you.

So, good cast, I’m in the mood for entertainment, and not expensive – duly bought.

And wasn’t it a good choice!

Batman Begins is an attempt to put into the film series enough realism to make the character and the stories connect to a maturing audience, to an audience (I am tempted to say post 9/11) which is less convinced by a black and white, good guy/bad guy vision of the world and where shades of darkness flick across even the brightest of lives.

Key to the concept is realism – and reason. Why did Batman become Batman? What made him take on this job, and what are the consequences of assuming the role of Revenge Artist?

I think it is one of those strange paradoxes that the closer to reality the fantasy is, the stronger the hold the fantasy has on the imagination: We need enough reality to construct our flights of fancy.

And the writers, actors, director and designers seem to have taken this to heart in this film.

Stunning sets, extremely realistic visual effects, three dimensional acting all in a sort of heightened realism create a sense of ‘This-could-happen’ in an, ‘If the world were like this – and in places it is’ location.

Gotham City is New York/Chicago/Any City. It is not the whole world – much of the story takes the proto-Batman out into a real world and expands the horizons not only of the character, but the movie.

Batman is vulnerable – emotionally, and physically. Bruce Wayne is presented as a human and when he dons the cape, he loses something of that, becoming stronger by cutting off his humanity. It isn’t a metamorphosis, it is a reduction – it is the animal inside all of us – and that is the connection frequently made (for me) by the film – not the super human flight I tried as a child, but instincts and drives lurking somewhere inside my subconscious.

Christian Bale manages the transformations of character exceptionally well – he starts as a young man with one set of thoughts and ideas, goes on a journey into the wilderness, encounters a mentor who he ultimately has to destroy, and returns to a city to take on the role of Batman – a crusader very much based on the real crusaders of old: The knights who were not opposed to a bit of immorality, dodgy reasoning and rape and pillage.

The rest of the cast is almost without exception, (and, as you would expect with the British connection) perfect.

If I make the film sound too ‘intellectual’ or uninteresting, I apologise – it isn’t either of those things – it is a very well made, high production values, action movie – maybe not for the younger children, but one teenagers and older-agers can enjoy with a couple of cans and a pizza.

Now, when is the next episode out?

(If this is in the wrong place, sorry - shift it)
 
Re: Review Batman Begins

Hi Akfarrar,

I'm glad you liked it. I'm a big proponent of how they started over so they could unload so much of the clutter from the other films. One of the reasons I liked it though was that I thought it was much LESS revisionist than burton's batman. Namely how burtan changed the man who killed Bruce's parents from Joe Chill from the original Bob Kane Comics to the Joker.
Of course I think in the original Bob Kane comic I think Batman shot Joe Chill with a gun point blank. Oh well, I can't have everything.
 

Similar threads


Back
Top