Nesacat
The Cat
I shall have to go home and check to make sure but off hand it sounds like I have quite a lot of them in separate collections.
Thank you very much.
Thank you very much.
If you ever need to find out if a HB edition is avaialable or upcoming you can always ask us folks here to be sure.......Still a disappointment, Barnes & Noble always misinforms me about hardcover editions. Recently I bought a complete chronicles of Narnia and asked adamently whther a hardcover edition existed, they of course said 'No" and just a few days ago I was browsing the fantasy section and found the exact same book I bought in a hardcover. Very heartbreaking for me. LOL
If you ever need to find out if a HB edition is avaialable or upcoming you can always ask us folks here to be sure...
I have those Del Rey editions and they're good but for the ulitmate collection look to Wandering Star publications. They're HB collector editions, quite pricey but apparentely excellent. Victor Gollancz also put out a near-complete set of Conan stories, fragments, synopsis etc.. in a single volume at a very affordable price. I have that one in adition to their Masterwork 2 volume edition. As you might gather I'm something of a Howard fan....
I've written some things about Conan on this site, I can direct you to them if you like?
Nice to see you here, cheers for now...
Which is your favorit ?
I felt for manns that he didnt ask here before he paid much more for three old vols of REH's Conan stories.
I think so.....It is called "Complete Chronicles Of Conan" - Centenary Edition.You have the same complete collection as me ? The one from 2006?
It has fragments of stories etc.
I always assumed that I would rather read the Sprague De Camp completions of the Conan story fragments than read the fragments unfinished but now I am not so sure.
The last story in the "Conan the Cimmerian" collection: "The Snout in the Dark" was such a fragment that was completed by De Camp. The fragment he had to work with was apparently a first draft of the first half and a rough outline of the other half. But in reading it it felt like De Camp had rush finished the story and was consequently a disappointing ending compared to the build up of the first half.
Perhaps he was more interested in tieing the stories together and establishing continuity than he was to doing justice to Howard's work?