Mark Robson
Dragon Writer
I take your comments as a compliment ...
Good. That was the intention.
I take your comments as a compliment ...
You don't get much choice...children are such an inconvenience and such a pain so frequently that if their parents weren't genetically programmed to love them they would generally abandon them - or worse.But you're right, barring a few years in adolescence when it was pretty much a toss-up, I do love my children more.
4 -Charlatans who want to sell books with rubbish, with or without a free lucky charm.
This above quote is a very common theme in the self-publishing route. I've read some good things about the self-publishing but the bottom line is always bucks. How much are you willing to lose your shirt, skirt, pants, or whatever in order to see your book published? Let's face it, they're not cheap.
Besides, the term "self-publishing" has been bandied about too many times that it becomes a dilution and a distortion of what it really means.
Vanity publishing: you pay your publisher to publisher your work for you. No editorship. No proofreading. No nothing. (However, you might get somebody to proofread your stuff.) It's printed out. But no guarentee that your books will be lined up on bookshelves at bookstores everywhere. (And I'm talking in US not UK.)
Self-publishing: You don't pay to get your book published. Get a printer, ink, paper. Viola! Your book is published. No editorship though. You could get somebody to proofread your stuff. Now that you got your book printed out in more than several copies. Where are you gonna put them at? Your warehouse? Can you afford to rent a small one? And distribution is also key.
Small Press: They're not vanity publishing. From what I've read, it would cost the publisher himself more than a pretty penny to print copies of one book and distribute them to certain bookstores that would take them to sell.
Bookstores are notoriously picky. They put out books that are traditionally published on shelves to sell, and then sent back the ones unsold for discount. Very few books that are vanity-published, small press, and self-published were on their shelves. The vanity-published won't allow for discounts. (At least, that's what I've read so far.) Is that unfair? Sure it is. I'm not putting these endeavors down. These are the realities of the publishing world.
Personally, I'd stick with the traditional route than "self-publishing". Vanity publishing can help if you're already published and have a fan base to get reprints. That's what happened with Peter Atkins and Dennis Etchison with theirs. Another thing that would work for you is if your book is nonfiction.
I based all these from what's happened here in the U.S. not in the U.K..
Lol that description fits so much the profile of a guy who mailed me today. When I replied that he would never be able to publish his story with the horrible grammar, spelling and story line unless he self published it, he got angry with me. Then he wanted to bet that he would get it published.I meant to add comment to the above quote about charlatans who publish rubbish. I know of several who think their works are masterpieces. And worst, they think the traditional publishers and other writers feared the potential of their geniuses. I won't mention their names. Not gonna give them the attention they don't deserve. I assure you they do exist, and they're notoriously unpleasant twits who dish out threats to any who critiqued their work, especially if they're trying to be helpful. That said, I shall now step off the soapbox.
I can't comment on the US but my experience in the UK leads me to different definitions of "vanity" and "self-publishing". As described in my web article ON PUBLISHING FICTIONI've read some good things about the self-publishing but the bottom line is always bucks. How much are you willing to lose your shirt, skirt, pants, or whatever in order to see your book published? Let's face it, they're not cheap.
Besides, the term "self-publishing" has been bandied about too many times that it becomes a dilution and a distortion of what it really means.
Vanity publishing: you pay your publisher to publisher your work for you. No editorship. No proofreading. No nothing. (However, you might get somebody to proofread your stuff.) It's printed out. But no guarentee that your books will be lined up on bookshelves at bookstores everywhere. (And I'm talking in US not UK.)
Self-publishing: You don't pay to get your book published. Get a printer, ink, paper. Viola! Your book is published. No editorship though. You could get somebody to proofread your stuff. Now that you got your book printed out in more than several copies. Where are you gonna put them at? Your warehouse? Can you afford to rent a small one? And distribution is also key.
I think that almost anyone would. The problem is that a first-time author has something like a one-in-a-thousand chance of getting published (if that). It isn't enough to be able to write well or even to come up with a really good story (although those are essentials, of course). To be accepted for publication over the thousands of other manuscripts under consideration, your book has to precisely meet what the publishers are looking for, and preferably have some sequels lined up.Personally, I'd stick with the traditional route than "self-publishing".
Thread starter | Similar threads | Forum | Replies | Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
D | A question of commas | Grammar & Spelling | 20 | |
D | Birdy question | Science & Nature | 12 | |
Tech question for Apple peeps (or those in the know) | Technology | 5 | ||
A question to those that have been in this situation... | Writing Discussion | 24 | ||
Quick question for those who have read Deadhouse Gates | Steven Erikson | 2 |