Resurrecting old 'Merlin' thread from Google cache - sorry only pages 2 and 4 found.
page 2
Ursa major: I'm not sure TV could do what you want (in the sense that it's hard to see the powers-that-be commissioning it).
And Merlin was specifically commissioned to sit in the Dr Who slot, so we ought to be glad it's as restrained as it is.
------------------------------------------
HareBrain: True enough. The frustrating thing is, that 20 years ago they might have done. Does anyone remember the 1991 Channel 4 version of Gawain and the Green Knight (written by David Rudkin, with Mark Warren among others)? Brilliant. And, as far as I can tell, never shown since. I still watch it every Christmas on a dodgy old VHS.
------------------------------------------
Overead: never even heard of it (which makes sense I am only just over 20 years old )
it is sad that TV is not the quality it once was - even wildlife is now mostly armchair affairs -
------------------------------------------
sloweye: if they run them alternately the will keep the viewing figures up all year round.
------------------------------------------
Precision Grace: Haha, could it be that HB is trying out for the spot vacated by Victor Meldrew?
I caught the second half of Merlin and was annoyed at first, specially when Merlin called Arthur a 'prat' but then I thought - let's face it, today's kids need to relate to this and this is probably the only way. It was watchable enough I suppose but not sure if I'll make extra specially sure to see it next week.
------------------------------------------
sloweye: yeah, if it was all thee's and hay nony nony the kids just wouldnt watch. i think it could shape up to be a good series with it humor.
------------------------------------------
Overread: Well I have seen first episode and here are my complaints/ thoughts
1) costuming is a bit weak - it just looks a little too modern for the period - as too is the lack of beards in the cast
2) things (sets) look too clean and new - though I must say it does link into the CGI cleanness as well - so it makes an overall effect.
3) like I said - CGI is a little too clean
4) Dragon was uninspiring - CGI not bad, but at little weak - but it was his voice that detracted - a good voice, but not a dragons voice I felt.
5) still trying to work out if I like Merlin or not - I think he is well cast for the young fool at times - and I think I would like him better if he did not look so clean looking all the time - just too clean in features, hair and cloths (barring his white - er brown - nightshirt
6) a few parts were rather info dumping weak - also I found it odd how merlin had a built in satnav for the castle - I mean just how did he know where everyone was living?
In the end the first episode had some lacking to my eyes, though I think there is enough to build on in the series so I will see a few more before a final verdict is cast. Certainly there is some quality actors in this - I hope they get a bit more time to shine. What I think is clear is that this is a one or two series planned feature - the writers/director don't assume a second series, which is why I think things are moving so fast. Seeing Giles from Buffy I was reminded that that series had a slower start to it (I would say infact its start was the strongest season) that just made you feel like it was going to keep going.
------------------------------------------
Lenny: Just started watching it (ah, the wonder of the iPlayer! ), and the first thing to strike me is how terrible King Uther's dialogue is at the very start. Eugh.
------------------------------------------
Overread: yah for such an actor he really did get the weakest starting line!
which reminds me his young ward - now I don't think they need perfect english, but I am afraid that America (and american english) were just not around them - jars a bit to have Giles speaking his part with a strong english against her more american accent!
------------------------------------------
Lenny: Just passed that, and I agree, it jars horribly. Though she does well to keep it in check most of the time.
Just a quick thought about Merlin - do his eyes always turn amber whem he does soemthing, or do they go different colours depending on what he does?
Anyway, ten minutes in now - no-one told me Eve Myles was in it! I'd have watched it at half seven if someone had told me Eve Myles was in it.
EDIT: Can't hear any Welsh in Ms. Myles' speaking. Young ward, take note.
------------------------------------------
Overread: think its mostly Amber - though I did not watch them that close
intersetingly it was very easy for him to get into the dragon pit - though I suppose it was one of those cases where only a madman would want to see the dragon
oh and does anyone else think that the castle does not look British?
oh drat now you know what is in the pit -- well you were bound to work it out ( the title helped )
------------------------------------------
Ursa major: I thought the castle looked French (it is, it's north of Paris), but guessed that it must be in central or eastern Europe, simply because that's where a lot of series are filmed nowadays.
------------------------------------------
Overread: I thought they were filmed in Cardiff and 5 feet from the BBC HQ (former)
and yes a French Castle was what I was thinking - too arty and fancy - that said they do have better towers than we tended to.
------------------------------------------
Ursa major: I posted a link to the castle's article on Wiki earlier in the thread, if you're interested in seeing more of it (and finding out why it looks the way it does).
------------------------------------------
Overread: Thanks Ursa - that it is more of a Palace than a Castle makes its grandeur more meaningful - though with all the CGI they could have made a dark, broody - retangle/square affair with battlements and blazing torches.
------------------------------------------
page 4
Antubis:
Originally Posted by Lenny
Anyway, not a bad first episode. I agree with people above that it's definitely not a historical drama, which is a bit of a shame because I like my Arthur/Merlin/Camelot mythology as much as the next man (then again, that can't really be called "historical drama" either!), but it is definitely an interesting take on it all.
I agree with that
I sort of liked it, but it will take some time for me to adjust. It isn't the traditional Arthur and Merlin drama/tragedy story. So far, it's just loosely based on the mythology, which is actually not that bad, because that makes it less easy to predict what kind of plot it will follow.
I was taken a bit aback by the young actors. It was a bit like watching the medieval and refined versions of Draco and Harry Potter. I hope that the tone of the series will not become too juvenile. But it is okay, so far.
I was pleasantly surprised by Guinevere. I might actually like Guinevere for once, now that she isn't depicted as a dainty, angelic looking damsel in distress. On the other hand, I have to adjust to that. As others have mentioned, I am happy to see that they don't overuse the CGI.
------------------------------------------
nj1: I'm going to reserve judgement fro the time being as I like to watch a few episodes first, Akthough I will say that expecting anything more than 'clean' on early primetime BBC1 would be a mistake.
Did everyone else get to watch MERLIN: THE LEGEND, shown on BBC2 (possibly just BBC2 Wales) straight after the BBC1 show? Basically it was a documentary on the myth of Merlin and was very interesting especially if your into the background
BBC iPlayer - Merlin the Legend
folow the link to watch!
------------------------------------------
Perpetual Man: Sorry for being late with the posting, but had a really hectic weekend, and all that...
I koved it, hokey language etc and all.
I've been a fan (if that is the right word) of the Arthurian myths and legends for most of my life, I've read studied (legitimatly) for years, and when you look book over the years the Arthurian legends have been adapted and translated to suit their times again and again.
Thomas Mallory's Le Morte D'Arthur updated the old legends, setting Arthur in the middle ages, the popular appearance of knights and chivalry; while Tennyson turn it into an epic romance with his poem The Idylls of the King. It's pretty funny to think that back in Victorian times you could have people looking in horror at Tennyson's tale and saying that this is nothing like it should be!
Of course very similar people would have been decrying the wonderful children's tale A Once and Future King when T H White produced it in the 1950's....
The Arthurian legends are4 something that have become reinterpreted every few generations, taking the themes and characters and representing them for a modern audience - and this is what the new series has done. Of course it is nothing like what has gone before, but then neither have any of the previous Arthurian works. The Mists of Avalon (Marion Zimmer Bradley) is as different from White as he is from Mallory, yet they all have a linking heart, introduing people to a fresh sense of magic and wonder, the basis for the story of Arthur and Merlin.
Of course there is nothing in the series that has any historical value - but then what does? It might be enough to make younger viewers pick up a few books and find out though!!
------------------------------------------
TK-421: Good news for those of us on this side of the pond. NBC has the rights and the series will start in January 2009. In Canada, it will be shown on CTV.
------------------------------------------
SpaceShip:
Originally Posted by Antubis
I wonder why the dragon is chained. I would have asked, if only out of curiosity. The dragon would have been better with less human eyes and more reptile ones, to give more of a dragon image. But hey, it's fantasy. And it might scare kids.
Wouldn't you think that the dragon could burn through the chain with it's fiery breath? Or have they dampened it somehow? Perhaps we'd better wait and see, eh?[/quote]
------------------------------------------
sloweye:
Originally Posted by TK-421
Good news for those of us on this side of the pond. NBC has the rights and the series will start in January 2009. In Canada, it will be shown on CTV.
thats cool, i have rellies in canada who will love that news.
------------------------------------------
purple kathryn: I think pratt is an old english word for arse actually
------------------------------------------
sloweye: Prat - Entry reviswouldn'thumoursat naved for OED Online - EnglishAmericanEnglishEnglishAmericanwhelmsomethinginterestinglyrectangleWorAlthoughprime-timefollowdhuntlegitimately appeal liintroducingst - Oxford English DictioCanadaPrattEnglishPratnary
------------------------------------------
Overread: Stop Stop Stop!
just re-watched this with a friend and she worked out what it is!
its not Arther - its not Merlin - its not even historical --- its DnD!
Pure and simple its DnD with a DM, plot hooks, hints and more
thinking like that I can enjoy it a little more - its also more amusing.
------------------------------------------
sloweye: Perfect description
------------------------------------------
Talysia: I must admit, I enjoyed the first episode more than I thought I would. I'd agree with most of the comments about the historical side of it, so I'll keep watching for a while and see how it goes.
------------------------------------------
chopper: overread has it spot on, i think. i watched it last night - loved the Norman-style helmets.....taking it seriously would be a mistake, but as a piece of Saturday-night fantasy it ain't too bad really. if it entices the young'uns to look at the source materials, it'll have done its job well.
------------------------------------------
sloweye: Spot on Chopper, my point exactly. It like taking Dr.Who or Buffy the vampire seriously. 'Fantasy' gives some slack on facts.....thats the point of it. my last couple of Christmases passed without giant spiders or flying titanics but i cant blame Russel.t.davis for that (.......or can i?
------------------------------------------
Urlik: I'm enjoying the series, but as a fantasy with characters whose names coincidentally are the same as those in Arthurian legend.
------------------------------------------
sloweye: Only just had the chance to watch todays ep'.
Thought it was great, will meller played a blinder. Lots of sword play and still not over doing the c.g.i. which is a plus. really enjoying it so far.
------------------------------------------