Belladonna is deadly nightshade, isn't it? (So called because renaissance ladies used to put drops of the juice in their eyes, which paralysed the iris, and made the pupils look huge. As one of the effects of sexual interest is dilation of the pupil, this gave a subtle cue to their male acquaintances {as well as blurring their vision to the point that said acquaintances were mere vague shadows, an advantage with most males}. It is obvious that interested=beautiful in male calculation.)
So, where was I (I have been known to deviate from the strait and narrow occasionally)? Oh yes, the worsery thread didn't exactly peter out – though I had prepared versions for both the pumpkin eater and the pepper picking pickler – it was just that it was only me doing them, which was a bit sad.
Welcome in; but don't expect to follow all the strange convolutions this thread has gone through in its short but eventful history. And no, the site won't accept five thousand words in one post. (How do I know? Loquacious, ain't I?) Besides, can you imagine reading through forty-two times five thousand words and making a judgement afterwards? That's a novel trilogy in itself, and since most people put off preparing for the vote until the last minute…
[quote='er 'onour]Hang on, wasn't he responsible for Budgies in the Wind...?[/quote]
Only if you're singing in French, and even then it's closer to moving (bouger)
Drifts off for monthly SFF pizza, humming 'Mona Lisas and mad hatters'…