I was quite happy with seven mentions/shortlists and three votes this month but, as always after posting, things occured to me about my entry that could have been improved on.
My entry for February:
Recycling…
Garrison swept the Lepotron, his latest time travel invention, off the bench. A pile of infuriating junk!
He examined the circuit diagram again. He was sure he’d been close. Perhaps a wiring fault? Flawed logic? Ah yes! It was obvious now.
Contrite, he reached to recover and fix the thing but a pair of broken wires momentarily touched allowing a capacitor to discharge…
Garrison swept the Lepotron, his latest time travel invention, off the bench.
The intention was that the touching of the broken wires and the discharging of the capacitor corrected the wiring fault that Garrison had detected, causing the Lepotron to spring into life and take it and him back to the moment where he swept it off the bench and so on...
Two days after submission it occurred to me that the story could be read that somehow the discharge of the capacitor wrecked the thing and Garrison just swept it off the bench again. In other words just a simple story about waste rather than a time-travel tale.
I could have made things much clearer as follows:
Recycling…
10:47 am Garrison swept the Lepotron, his latest time travel invention, off the bench. A pile of infuriating junk!
He examined the circuit diagram again. He was sure he’d been close. Perhaps a wiring fault? Flawed logic? Ah yes! It was obvious now.
Contrite, he reached to recover and fix the thing but broken wires touched allowing a capacitor to discharge…
10:47 am Garrison swept the Lepotron, his latest time travel invention, off the bench.
Needed? Too obvious? Any other comments?