The Imp
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 25, 2008
- Messages
- 5,377
I agree with this but I still woudn't call it egregious, given the crcumstantial evidence and clues littered about. I think it's far more likely that GRRM did this to leave a little doubt and room for discussion, nothing more, but if in the end it turns out that Ned is alive, the way in which that particular story is told will determine my feelings. Again though, I agree in principle with what you said.For me, it would be egregious for Ned to be alive because it would cheapen the power and effect that the scene had on many readers. Eddard dying is arguably the first point in the series where you knew GRRM wasn't messing around. Where you knew this series was really something special. Something gritty and realistic and possibly without any happy endings. Sure, Bran getting thrown off a tower was shocking, but he survived. Sure, Lady's execution was shocking and emotional but it was "just" an animal without a POV. Eddard dying blew me away since he seemed destined to be a major POV for the entirety of the series. I did not see his death coming at all. I hope GRRM doesn't take the power of that scene away from us by bringing him back to life. I'm not saying your theory isn't plausible because it is; I'm just saying that I hope it doesn't come true.
I wouldn't care if Syrio came back or turned out to be Jaqen or whatever. I mean, Syrio was a cool character but I never got very emotionally attached to him, probably because he didn't have a POV.