olive -- I thought I understood your story, but now I'm not so sure. My first read was that they're two stucco/plaster putti on the ceiling of the theatre who have been trapped in place, but can now release themselves as an adjoining bit of plasterwork has broken free, and they are about to drop down, though quite what happens when they hit the ground is another matter. But I can't recall ever seeing lions as part of a ceiling decoration in a theatre or equivalent, nor do I get what "base" he broke from.
I got a bit confused by the line "Sometimes we end up in bad pieces" as I wasn't sure if that was meant to be "places" or they literally do end up in pieces, having been smashed. But if they have done this before, why does it seem to have come as such as surprise to Pambino? And if they're getting better each time, why does Guilio say "We just managed to lose our wings" as if it's no big deal? And I'm afraid the line about waking up in art went straight over my head.
Anyhow, it's a fun idea, and handled quite well, and the last line was nicely comic. For myself, I'd have liked a bit more about the setting -- ie if it is a theatre -- and their background -- eg where they've been stuck before and how they got free. Overall, it felt a bit laid back, which fitted the humour well, but for me the slightly repetitive nature of the conversation and the lack of urgency in the writing worked against the story, making it seem too low-key and trifling. But as a first attempt, you're right to be pleased with it.
Look at the picture. Do you see the right corner broken up there? It's the broken, corner 'base' supporting the decoration platform, also there is no figure on it. But the whole decoration is designed in symetry, if you look at the left corner there is a lion figure there. So there was a lion figure at the right side before too. Also the corner was just broken down from the exact point it at the base that sperated the part of the lion figure from the part Guilio and Pambino occuppied. Something is wrong, don't you think? Something is happening there. Because that is not just the only damaged part in the theatre's decoration, it is also very high up, so whatever happened there highly likely it wasn't an
accident. It was deliberate.
E: It's the Left Leo from their point of view, the Right Leo from ours.
When we look into it, we catch Guilio and Pambino at the dawn of a great epiphany which was long coming. Mostly Guilio, he is the type who would notice things, question all this and push, Pambino is more like a go with the flow, happy go lucky type. He sleeps too much anyway.
They are conscious, individual beings. They started their life as a pair of putti hundreds of years ago -at least they only remember that far- but every time something happened to the material supported their forms that would compromise the integrity of the art work they lived in, they found themselves in another art work, in a similar, but different form. At some point they have lost their wings, because they have stopped ending in putti figures. Probably they've started in a painting or may be in a mural, I don't know, but definitely not in a 3 dimensional piece. So as the time passed -which is a very long time- they started to find themselves in more complicated, more dynamic, bigger forms than what they started with.
I don't know why this is happening to them. (They are not the only ones. But they are pretty highly developed ones.) Probably because all forms are some sort of derivative of each other started as very simple ones in the end/beginning. While the forms kept developing, because it wasn't a linear kind of development (the change and the experience of being in different forms; the accumulation of being in different forms) caused this tiny bit of
essence being born in it and that started to gain consciousness, individuality and character independent from its form. It started to gain more and more experience, because artists -which were craftsmen of the time and the ones who made these particular ones are not artist either, they are craftsmen- even the ones who created original works started to do it by imitating others' works. They added on added on... This is a process as old as our history.
So obviously, the right Leo couldn't take being in that awful piece which is a very bad example of a common form in a common position, and at some point in his long severe depression he managed to jump. When he jumped, he broke into pieces and so managed to escape. Where? who knows, hopefully in a better lion figure.
Guilio had started to figure this all out some time ago. Of course Pambino knows his theories because he keeps talking about them, they only have each other, but as they don't have any mortal urgencies, it probably took a very long time and very bad examples/imitations of art to get through. I don't know the exact process or how and when Guilio got it, but I know he would choose to drown in Rococo rather than living in an overgrown, manifactured, plaster toddler with flailing arms pretending to give a dynamic pose.
This was just a theory Guilio kept thinking about until he reached the point to be capable, strong enough after he realised what the Right Leo actually did. [He also sensed something from the Left Leo, but I had to remove that as I couldn't make it fit due to the word count and but then also I find it better this way.]
So the Right Leo's jump was the catalyst. It also made their job much easier compared to him. They had an idea about how they changed forms, but the realisation of the fact that they could do it on their own, jump and break themselves into pieces, to get to some different
pieces and
place, not necessarily an art work may be, but how to
move from piece to piece instead of waiting in one for something to happen to the decoration or the theatre by outside forces happens in the this dialogue.
So we witness them making their first conscious jump. One little jump for the Right Leo, a giant leap for Pambino and Guilio.
I wrote 'places' in that sentence first as you suggested, but then 'pieces' I think the right word. Because they are the independet symmetrical piece(s) of one composition struggling to break in pieces to be independent. Also as plaster they are made from simple moulds, probably same one is used for each figure. Connected to the idea of every figure as some derivative of each other in a symmetrical, smaller sense.
When I looked into the picture for the first time, that broken corner was the first thing I saw. Imagine the process like this. A little tiny piece of rope was dangling from that part; that corner of the picture. I pulled it and suddenly
this piled on me jumping out of it. Dust, mortar all over the place, on me, bits and pieces are falling down right and left, I am trying to catch and collect every piece and fit into each other 'the right way'. As if the 'right way' was there hidden and not mine. That is what I meant by 'I wrote that as if I was
possessed'. It's an unvbelievable experience. Like magic. It's a bit frightening. Also apparently, I see myself as a sum of Pambino and Guilio. *Nervous laugh. I don't have delusions of being a writer one day, I honestly just want to learn about writing -stories- to empty my mind, otherwise I'll go bonkers, because I have anxiety in real life. For the first time this was a bit too much, too real. Pretty intense. So am I pleased with it? Yes, because it made sense to me, but I have no idea what really happened.
Thank you.