Nerds_feather
Purveyor of Nerdliness
2. We're used to seeing rape of women in fiction generally, maybe in fantasy particularly, as part of the setting, as a lazy shorthand of making the villain really villainous, as a lazy motivator for male heroes, as part of the background for the female characters. All writing builds on what's gone before so there's a tendency to echo and repeat, perhaps subconsciously, perhaps deliberately, the sorts of characters and scenarios we've seen before. That's probably particularly true for male writers in this case, since women are going to have a lot of real life experience of being a woman to temper skewed fictional representations, men obviously much less so.
All of this means that rape of women is an easy, maybe even a 'safe', cliche to fall into as a writer (perhaps particularly a male writer), whereas rape of men is much more something you've got to make a deliberate (I'd say quite bold) choice to cover.
Totally agree with this. It *could* be treated in a meaningful and profound way, it just usually isn't. Since this is overlapping with the dedicated "rape in fantasy" thread (but with mostly different people involved), I'll just cut/paste from there:
I'd ask: What's this rape doing? Who's perspective is it from? How would a victim react to it? And what, if anything, is gained from it?
Unfortunately, the answer is often: "establishing the terrible terrors of this fantasy world from the perspective of the (male) rapist in a way that's going to be awfully triggery for an actual victim without adding much to the story that couldn't have been added without the rape."