Great Galaxy! I did get a mention. Thank you Phyrebrat. You made my day shine bright.These are my favourites and votes. Have to also give a shout out to Starbeast; gotta pay homage when Star Wars is mentioned
That was a reference to my failed attempt at the previous challenge with the picture of the narrowboat and the spider websI'm still trying to get my head around the imagery of "half-way though that alien invasion by space-spiders and went on a narrowboat cruise on the Norfolk Broads"
@Mouse your story really made me angry and I had to do some CBT
You don't have to: the usernames of those who voted for a story are public.I wont say which I picked in the tie breaker
You bring up an interesting point - the tools of analysis. For prospective writers, this is interesting stuff. What do readers respond to? The emotional punch? The intriguing concept/ idea? The writing 'style'? Must put together a list for a poll of some kind, if I can figure out how. Chrons would be a good sample size. Hmmm. Looks around. "Now, where's me thinking gin?"A vote-off eh? I didn't vote for either story originally, so I'm now in the unacceptable position of having to make a choice.
They both are wonderful stories. Astro Pen's story has a great concept and a gut-punch of a last line, but for the sheer quality of the writing, I'm giving it to Bean.
It’s quite difficult. We’ve talked about this for years and it always seems to be predicated on a wide variety of preferences. I try to write mine the way I write a scene in a book; it has to have a conclusion to the scene that naturally leads the reader to think about something or see the story in a different light. Astro Pen’s does this greatly this month.You bring up an interesting point - the tools of analysis. For prospective writers, this is interesting stuff. What do readers respond to? The emotional punch? The intriguing concept/ idea? The writing 'style'? Must put together a list for a poll of some kind, if I can figure out how. Chrons would be a good sample size. Hmmm. Looks around. "Now, where's me thinking gin?"
Hi Phyrebrat. So, em, I'm not really talking about this writing competition, (see below) as there are many elements involved - some of which you've alluded to. For me, and I imagine most, it's a great way to get the juices going - esp 300 words or less - not too heavy, but enough to get in a message/ idea. So, in short, it's a great writing exercise, but would not be an event from which one could derive the information I seek.It’s quite difficult. We’ve talked about this for years and it always seems to be predicated on a wide variety of preferences. I try to write mine the way I write a scene in a book; it has to have a conclusion to the scene that naturally leads the reader to think about something or see the story in a different light. Astro Pen’s does this greatly this month.
I did one about a guy who’s in love with someone. At the end you find out he’s stalking her and sleeping in the drawer under her bed. Those kind of things I call a wallop or a punchline. These are jus two examples. A comedy punchline is just as valid.
My observations:
A reveal or punchline tends to do best with votes over clever word use.
After a period of time, you will become biased to certain authors. That’s fine. We like what we like. I’ll often vote for Dan or Jane, Johnnyjet, Chrispy and a few others because they usually submit something that appeals to me.
Poetry doesn’t do well. To be honest I’d be as bold to say only Chrispy is writing poetry here, but I do see a lot of doggerel/limerick rhyme schemes. I think it can do better in the 75 than the 300.
Vignettes without a conclusion or some sense of action/conflict do very poorly.
Writing then submitting is always a bad idea. My advice is
1: Write it
2: edit it
3: trunk it for at least a week (unless you’re last minute dot com)
4: reread it near the deadline and if it’s perfect. Then submit.
I say this because I won’t ever vote (or rather, rarely) would vote for a ldn entry with typos or grammar errors. I see the challenges as a learning tool so I figure if an entrant can’t be fussed to perfect their grammar then I can’t vote for it. There are exceptions for really good entries but …
Also, I have a twisted sense of humour so most comedic ones don’t work for me.
Those just off the top of me bonce!
Yes, I don't want to comment too much on the specific stories while judging is taking place, but generally I try to add a human element. SF can be one dimensional and dry. People are complex creatures, not single roles,It’s quite difficult. We’ve talked about this for years and it always seems to be predicated on a wide variety of preferences. I try to write mine the way I write a scene in a book; it has to have a conclusion to the scene that naturally leads the reader to think about something or see the story in a different light. Astro Pen’s does this greatly this month.
I did one about a guy who’s in love with someone. At the end you find out he’s stalking her and sleeping in the drawer under her bed. Those kind of things I call a wallop or a punchline. These are jus two examples. A comedy punchline is just as valid.
My observations:
A reveal or punchline tends to do best with votes over clever word use.
After a period of time, you will become biased to certain authors. That’s fine. We like what we like. I’ll often vote for Dan or Jane, Johnnyjet, Chrispy and a few others because they usually submit something that appeals to me.
Poetry doesn’t do well. To be honest I’d be as bold to say only Chrispy is writing poetry here, but I do see a lot of doggerel/limerick rhyme schemes. I think it can do better in the 75 than the 300.
Vignettes without a conclusion or some sense of action/conflict do very poorly.
Writing then submitting is always a bad idea. My advice is
1: Write it
2: edit it
3: trunk it for at least a week (unless you’re last minute dot com)
4: reread it near the deadline and if it’s perfect. Then submit.
I say this because I won’t ever vote (or rather, rarely) would vote for a ldn entry with typos or grammar errors. I see the challenges as a learning tool so I figure if an entrant can’t be fussed to perfect their grammar then I can’t vote for it. There are exceptions for really good entries but …
Also, I have a twisted sense of humour so most comedic ones don’t work for me.
Those just off the top of me bonce!
That's you off my Christmas list... ok, you were never on it... and I don't have one... but if I did, and you'd have been on it, I would have taken you off.After a period of time, you will become biased to certain authors. That’s fine. We like what we like. I’ll often vote for Dan or Jane, Johnnyjet, Chrispy and a few others because they usually submit something that appeals to me.
For me, it depends on how I'm feeling at the time. Something that makes me smile often gets on my shortlist, angst less so, same with strict sci-fi - I don't understand the big words.You bring up an interesting point - the tools of analysis. For prospective writers, this is interesting stuff. What do readers respond to? The emotional punch? The intriguing concept/ idea? The writing 'style'? Must put together a list for a poll of some kind, if I can figure out how. Chrons would be a good sample size. Hmmm. Looks around. "Now, where's me thinking gin?"
I’m was wondering where my Christmas sprout card was last yearThat's you off my Christmas list... ok, you were never on it... and I don't have one... but if I did, and you'd have been on it, I would have taken you off.