AI generated art

I have no idea. I've noticed a number of distortions - particularly if a human figure is in a pose other than just standing. Check the first comic cover I posted. Does she have four arms?. I'm wondering if it's a distorted pistol.
 
This girl has got really wierd hands
tb1.jpg
 
I think AI art was designed to make "good" artwork or what would pass for good artwork. It draws from the work of verified talented artists and uses its programming to attempt to make successful pictures. Using AI to create art is like rowing downstream, its very easy to do. Rowing upstream is a different story. Is there a way to ask for bad artwork that has been made by someone with no talent?
 
Using AI to create art is like rowing downstream, its very easy to do. Rowing upstream is a different story. Is there a way to ask for bad artwork that has been made by someone with no talent?
Many have said the same thing about photography.

One might argue the 99% of the results in Text-to-Image generated images is the results of someone with no talent. I asked for "Mona Lisa" NOT "Picasso!!!"
 
Is there a way to ask for bad artwork that has been made by someone with no talent?
I've tried this but I'm finding it pretty much impossible to produce bad artwork. Admittedly, I've only been mucking around with it for a few days so it might be my inexperience that is the problem.

These are my best efforts
stick.jpg
stick2.jpg
cow3.jpg
cow2a.jpg
 
Last edited:
I thought this was interesting. I sent a friend a few of the pictures that I'd generated and he made a video with one of them.
I'm not sure if he used another AI package to do this or not but I quite like it. I've asked him for details.
 
"playful monsters roaming the neighborhood" - Painted Anime style - the middle one was interesting to me. Perhaps the monster is within us all.
1735407957815.png
 
I’ve noticed that the AI often has serious problems with the symmetry of the human form. Some of my rejects look like Ripley’s failed clones in Alien: Resurrection.
It's not just the human form. Try getting AI to do a cat or bunch of cats and you get a vast variety of one-eyed, or three-eyed cats - some of which have two or three or no tails. Also extra legs. Horses are even worse - AI doesn't know where to put the legs or how many. I tried to get the AI to do "skeleton on a white horse" for Halloween and ended up sort-of-skeleton on a deranged Sleipnir. AI somehow manages to do dogs ok though (so far anyway). So, who knows?!
 
I’ve noticed that the AI often has serious problems with the symmetry of the human form. Some of my rejects look like Ripley’s failed clones in Alien: Resurrection.
I guess the problem is that, as commented on previously, the AI doesn't have knowledge or rules as such, so it doesn't know that people and animals should have two eyes. It learns from other images and, setting aside the like of Picasso and depending on the point of view, such images may well only have, or at least show, a single eye (or leg or arm or finger or whatever). Which doesn't really excuse the instances of three eyes but again, it has no knowledge so just knows that there are usually some of these almond shaped eye things, not how many, and roughly where they appear on the body.
 
THIS IS NOT AI GENERATED.
This is from a search for medieval paintings of cats. It turns out "knowing" what something looks like might not provide for realistic images by the creator of the art. Of course I'm making the assumption that the medieval painter had actually seen a cat prior to painting this:
1735486652357.png
 
THIS IS NOT AI GENERATED.
This is from a search for medieval paintings of cats. It turns out "knowing" what something looks like might not provide for realistic images by the creator of the art. Of course I'm making the assumption that the medieval painter had actually seen a cat prior to painting this:
View attachment 128248
You are also assuming the painter knows how to paint/draw!
 
I don't think there's anything unusual about medieval cats looking like that. As this article points out, in other areas of history, paintings were done by trained artists but, during the medieval period, most work was done by monks or ordinary people chronicling their lives and times and who were often untrained and therefore were not following any specific artistic conventions. I think it would be a mistake to draw any form of conclusion based on a search that lacks any context.

 

Similar threads


Back
Top