I think both the medical and astronomy examples are good but it's all very niche.
Only a select number of people or organisations will ever pay for a licence to be able to utilise astronomical or medical AI. People with phones that use AI for most irrelevant or puerile things is where the money is at because these customers exist in their hundreds of millions. I'm sure that some people will claim that it 'helps me navigate through my emails' or something similar but, to most, it will just be another toy and another excuse to buy a newer phone. Marketing AI is probably a good way for phone manufacturers to avoid the plateau effect on sales, and correspondingly the mountain of old, perfectly usable phones will steadily increase.
Only a select number of people or organisations will ever pay for a licence to be able to utilise astronomical or medical AI. People with phones that use AI for most irrelevant or puerile things is where the money is at because these customers exist in their hundreds of millions. I'm sure that some people will claim that it 'helps me navigate through my emails' or something similar but, to most, it will just be another toy and another excuse to buy a newer phone. Marketing AI is probably a good way for phone manufacturers to avoid the plateau effect on sales, and correspondingly the mountain of old, perfectly usable phones will steadily increase.
I tested Google Gemini and Apple Intelligence. Here’s which one you should use
Google has given Apple an AI roadmap it should use as it creates Apple Intelligence. Whether it learns from the good and the bad is open to debate.
www.digitaltrends.com