Re: DISCUSSION the 75 Word Challenge JUNE 2011
Well, as long as you consciously fail to vote ....
Well, as long as you consciously fail to vote ....
Rabble Rabble!
As for regional offices: Here in California, all we have is a tent and a camp chair that keeps folding up when you try to sit down. The nearest drinking fountain is half a block away, and the raccoons eat up any stores of food the management supplies.
I bet it's in the Napa valley, too!
I recently checked the rules for the challenges as posted by my learned friend, and in strict interpretation of them, we should all be disqualified for plagiarism....
ps: teresa, you're up early aren't you?
Definitely... I just googled 'if' and worked through the verses until I found one I could palgai.... work in a similar theme.
Interesting point Boneman - If you want to open a can of worms.
Does the manipulation of original Kipling work constitute plagiarism and if so, has the theme itself tied people into that mode? If that is the case, then I expect that those entries that have a more direct relationship to Kipling's work i.e variations of the 'If' poem, or 'Boots' are probably more likely to get a vote, as they seem more within the style most of us know? Re: All the posts from people saying 'I don't have a clue about Kipling?'
Parody allows a lot of latitude before it's considered plagiarism. So I don't think that anyone here needs to worry about that. Certainly not for anything we have seen so far.
On the other hand, there is nothing that says this month's entries have to be parody, so no one has to worry about that, either. Just as we each interpret the theme differently each month, so "the style of Kipling" may mean something different to each of us, as we write our stories, and later when we vote.
The main thing is to stretch ourselves a little, meet the Challenge in the way* that seems best to each of us, and have fun doing so.
*There are at least nine and sixty of these. Kipling would tell you so himself.
*There are at least nine and sixty of these. Kipling would tell you so himself.
And my original posting about plagiarism was (supposed to be) very much tongue-in-cheekAnd my original posting about plagiarism was (supposed to be) very much tongue-in-cheek, since Chris had directed us there. More of the entries seem to have been humourous this month, so far. So I'd say we are having fun with it, even if it seemed so much more of a challenge, when we first looked at it.