How about how to effectively use punctuation, period!
But yes I agree, I was thinking once we had a couple more people with the book, it would be worth beginning to discuss it in more general terms; preferred approach, etc. Those who haven't got it yet can get a pretty good idea from the contents list I posted before and have re-posted below.
Introduction
1. Subject, Reader, and Kinds of Writing
2. Strategy and Style
3. Grammar, Usage, and Mechanics
PART 1 The Writing Process
4. Looking for Subjects
5. Exploring for Topics
6. Making a Plan
7. Drafts and Revisions
PART II. The Essay
8. Beginning
9. Closing
10. Organizing the Middle
11. Point of View, Persona, and Tone
PART III The Expository Paragraph
12. Basic Structure
13. Paragraph Unity
14. Paragraph Development: (1) Illustration and Restatement
15. Paragraph Development: (2) Comparison, Contrast, and Analogy
16. Paragraph Development: (3) Cause and Effect
17. Paragraph Development: (4) Definition, Analysis, and Qualification
PART VI. The Sentence
18. The Sentence: A Definition
19. Sentence Styles
20. The Well-Written Sentence: (1) Concision
21. The Well-Written Sentence: (2) Emphasis
22. The Well-Written Sentence: (3) Rhythm
23. The Well-Written Sentence: (4) Variety
PART V. Diction
24. Meaning
25. Clarity and Simplicity
26. Concision
27. Figurative Language
28. Unusual Words and Collocations
29. Improving Your Vocabulary: Dictionaries
PART VI. Description and Narration
30. Description
31. Narration
PART VII. Punctuation
Introduction
32. Stops
33. The Other Marks
I am inclined to work through from beginning to end. however I am also inclined to group chapters together (to achieve six months we will need to tackle at least two chapters at a time).
Now as Tactical Loco observed the book does emphasise the essay rather than the novel (sorry about that, I missed that when I was researching) and I'm not so sure that Part II is desperately relevant to our needs. However please speak up if you disagree! I believe most of the rest is actually relevant; we just need to apply a little bias to it. So, for example, Exploring for Topics and Making a Plan are written with an empahsis on factual essays but the techniques are still applicable for novels. Both int the macro and the micro. IE. applied to the story as a whole and to individual parts of it. Deciding what topics need to be covered in this chapter/section/paragraph and making a plan for it are really just as relevant for the story as they are for the essay (he says as though he is already the great authority on novel writing
))
Part III -The Expository Paragraph - is also very relevant. I think the Aspiring Writers sub-forum sometimes gets a bit obsessive about 'show don't tell'. In both SF and F there is inevitably a lot of world building required, we are after all setting stories in alternative worlds whether past, future or sideways! And these world will always require some explanation as well as progressive revealing through action.
As an exercise I picked up a random selection of my SF and F books and could find none that didn't have a considerable amount of exposition; particularly in the early parts. Maybe that is why series are so popular in these genres; they release both the author and the reader from quite so much of it. I suppose it could therefore be argued that for SF and F getting exposition right is almost more important.
However the remaining parts of the book are probably of most interest, so that is where we probably want to spend most time. I would suggest grouping some of the earlier parts into bigger chunks but still covering them.
Re Part II I am not so sure. I need to take a closer look at those chapters. Beginnings, middles and endings are just as important for the novel, but do they need to be approached very differently to the essay?
Sorry for the huge post again. I seem to be doing rather a lot of these around this project!