I tend to agree, though I guess it is purely a test of human powered speed. Similar arguments could be made about many other things; for example using bottled oxygen to climb Everest (and other high mountains). Using such oxygen reduces the effective height of the mountain by at least a thousand meters or more. Especially as it has been shown by mountaineers such as Rheinhold Messner that with enough training it is possible without such bottled oxygen.The windscreen also makes the whole thing meaningless imho.
I believe these weren't even what we now call 'flat screens.' I think they were actually still built around a CRT.2001 Argos catalogue, there's some monster prices for the new fangled flat screen TVs
View attachment 123524
They were: I bought a 32" one (partly funded by a 21-years service award; otherwise I would never have bought it), to replace an old 21" one and it required two people to carry it. Luckily, I always put the TV in the corner of the room, so it didn't intrude too far into the room.I think they were actually still built around a CRT.
And I still use one (occasionally), a Sony Trinitron. In 4:3 aspect ratio!I believe these weren't even what we now call 'flat screens.' I think they were actually still built around a CRT.
Amstrad did a similar design in the early 1980sGiant screen TV with integrated VCR from 1978.
It must have taken an eight man delivery team!
View attachment 123358
As seen three pages ago
sh*t happensAs seen three pages ago
Old Tech thread
Not exactly ancient tech but one thing I find curious is that my old 1995 Technics CD player (seperates sterio system) will play CD's that my modern portable CD player won't. The modern system struggles with CD's produced by small time artists (You know the sort you buy at a gig. Yes they still...www.sffchronicles.com